Вопросы теоретической экономики

Литература

1. Agh A. (2016). The Decline of Democracy in East-Central Europe: Hungary as the Worst-Case Scenario // PostCommunism. Vol. 63. Is. 5-6. Рр. 277-287.
2. Amna E., Ekman J. (2014). Standby citizens: Diverse faces of political passivity // European Political Science Review. Vol. 6. Is 2. Pp. 261-281.
3. Ash E., Mukand S., Rodrik D. (2021). Economic Interests, Worldviews, and Identities: Theory and Evidence on Ideational Politics / NBER Working Paper 29474.
4. Baldwin J.W. (1959). The Medieval Theories of the Just Price: Romanists, Canonists, and Theologians in the Twelfth and Thirteenth Centuries // Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, New Series. Vol. 49. No. 4. Pp. 1-92.
5. Bendixen T. (2019). Sense or non-sense? A critical discussion of a recent evolutionary-cognitive approach to "folk-economic beliefs" // Evolution, Mind and Behaviour. Vol. 17. Is. 1. Рр. 29-47.
6. Bhattacharjee A., Dana J. (2018). Not all folk-economic beliefs are best understood through our ancestral past // Behavioral and Brain Sciences. Vol. 41. e163.
7. Bhattacharjee A., Dana J., Baron J. (2017). Anti-Profit Beliefs: How People Neglect the Societal Benefits of Profit // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Vol. 113. No. 5. Рр. 671-696.
8. Bischof D., Allinger T.L., Le Corre J.M., Frederiksen K.V.S. (2023). (Mis-)Perceiving Support for Democracy: The Role of Social Norms for Democracies / Working Papers, Department of Political Science, Aarhus University (DK)
9. Bix B. (2018). Kelsen, Hart, and Legal Normativity // Revus. Journal for Constitutional Theory and Philosophy of Law (Revija Za Ustavno Teorijo in Filozofijo Prava). Vol. 34. Рр. 25-42.
10. Blendon R., Benson J., Brodie M., Morin R., Altman D., Gitterman D., Brossard M., James M. (1997). Bridging the Gap Between the Public's and Economists' View of the Economy // Journal of Economic Perspectives. Vol. 11. No. 3. Рр. 105-118.
11. Boland F.K., Davidai S. (2024). Zero-sum beliefs and the avoidance of political conversations // Communications Psychology. Vol. 2. Article 43. DOI: 10.1038/s44271-024-00095-4.
12. Boyd W. (2018). Just Price, Public Utility, and the Long History of Economic Regulation in America // Yale Journal on Regulation*. Vol. 35. Рр. 721-777.
13. Boyer P, Petersen M.B. (2018). Folk-economic beliefs: An evolutionary cognitive model // Behavioral and Brain Sciences. Vol. 41. Article e158.
14. Caplan B. (2001). What makes people think like economists? Evidence on economic cognition from the Survey of Americans and Economists on the Economy // Journal of Law and Economics. Vol. 44. No. 2. Pp. 395-426.
15. Caplan B. (2002). Systematically Biased Beliefs about Economics: Robust Evidence of Judgemental Anomalies from the Survey of Americans and Economists on the Economy // Economic Journal. Vol. 112. No. 479. Pр. 433-458.
16. Caplan B., Miller S.C. (2010).Intelligence makes people think like economists: Evidence from the General Social Survey // Intelligence. Vol. 38. Is. 6. Pр. 636-647.
17. Caprara G.V., Schwartz S., Capanna C., Vecchione M., Barbaranelli C. (2006). Personality and politics: Values, traits, and political choice // Political Psychology. Vol. 27. Is. 1. Pр. 1-28.
18. Carvalho J.-P., Bergeron A., Henrich J., Nunn N., Weigel J. (2023). Zero-sum thinking, the evolution of effort suppressing beliefs, and economic development. NBER Working Paper 31663. DOI: 10.3386/w31663.
19. Chrysanthou G.M., Guillo M.D. (2024). Identifying the economic determinants of individual voting behaviour in UK general elections // Oxford Economic Papers. Vol. 76. Is. 1. Pр. 267-289. DOI: 10.1093/oep/gpad003.
20. Cianetti L., Dawson J. & Hanley S. (2018). Rethinking "democratic backsliding" in Central and Eastern Europe - looking beyond Hungary and Poland // East European Politics. Vol. 34. Is. 3. Pр. 243-256.
21. Clifton J.D. W., Kerry N. (2023). Belief in a dangerous world does not explain substantial variance in political attitudes, but other world beliefs do // Social Psychological and Personality Science. Vol. 14. Is. 5. Pр. 515-525. DOI: 10.1177/19485506221119324.
22. Davidai S. & Tepper S. J. (2023). The psychology of zero-sum beliefs // Nature Reviews Psychology. Vol. 2. Pp. 472-482. DOI:10.1038/s44159-023-00194-9.
23. Davidai S., Ongis M. (2019). The politics of zero-sum thinking: The relationship between political ideology and the belief that life is a zero-sum game // Science Advances. Vol. 5. Is. 12. Article eaay3761.
24. De Roover R. (1958). The Concept of the Just Price: Theory and Economic Policy // Journal of Economic History. Vol. 18. No. 4. Pp. 418-434.
25. Dequech D. (2006). Institutions and Norms in Institutional Economics and Sociology // Journal of Economic Issues. Vol. 40. No. 2. Pp. 473-481.
26. Diessner S. (2023). The power of folk ideas in economic policy and the central bank-commercial bank analogy // New Political Economy. Vol. 28. No. 2. Pp. 315-328. DOI: 10.1080/13563467.2022.2109610.
27. Dinas E., Martinez S. and Valentim V. (2024). Social Norm Change, Political Symbols, and Expression of Stigmatized Preferences // Journal of Politics. Vol. 86. No. 2. Pp. 488-506. DOI: 10.2139ssrn.3516931.
28. Dixon R., Griffiths W., Lim G. C. (2014). Lay people's models of the economy: A study based on surveys of consumer sentiments // Journal of Economic Psychology. Vol. 44. Pp. 13-20.
29. Dodd M. D., Balzer A., Jacobs C. M., Gruszczynski M. W., Smith K. B. and Hibbing J. R. (2012). The political left rolls with the good and the political right confronts the bad: connecting physiology and cognition to preferences // Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. Vol. 367. Is. 1589. Pp. 640-649.
30. Eidelman S., Crandall C.S., Goodman J.A. and Blanchar J.C. (2012). Low-Effort Thought Promotes Political Conservatism // Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. Vol. 38. Is. 6. Pp. 808-820.
31. Facchini F. (2017). Public choice failure and voter incompetence in France // Political Quarterly. Vol. 88. Is. 2. Pp. 258-264.
32. Facchini F, Melki M. (2014). Political Ideology and Economic Growth: Evidence from the French Democracy // Economic Inquiry. Vol. 52. Is. 4. Pp. 1408-1426.
33. Fama E. F. (1970). Efficient Capital Markets: A Review of Theory and Empirical Work // Journal of Finance. Vol. 25. No. 2. Pp. 383-417.
34. Feldman S. & Johnston C. (2014). Understanding the determinants of political ideology: Implications of structural complexity // Political Psychology. Vol. 35. Is. 3. Pp. 337-358.
35. Forstmann M. and Burgmer P. (2018). The mind of the market: Lay beliefs about the economy as a willful, goal-oriented agent // Behavioral and Brain Sciences. Vol. 41. Article e169.
36. Frank R.H., Gilovich T. and Regan D.T. (1993). Does Studying Economics Inhibit Cooperation? // Journal of Economic Perspectives. Vol. 7. No. 2. Pp. 159-171.
37. Frank R.H., Gilovich T.D., Regan D.T. (1996). Do Economists Make Bad Citizens? // Journal of Economic Perspectives. Vol. 10. No. 1. Pp. 187-192.
38. Frey B.S., Pommerehne W.W. (1993). On the fairness of pricing - An empirical survey among the general population // Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization. Vol. 20. Is. 3. Pp. 295-307.
39. Funk C.L., Smith K.B., Alford J.R., HibbingM.V., Eaton N.R., Krueger R.F., Eaves L.J., Hibbing J.R. (2013). Genetic and environmental transmission of political orientations // Political Psychology. Vol. 34. Is. 6. Pp. 805-819.
40. Goldstein D.A.N. (2022). The Social Foundations of Democratic Norms (October 26, 2022). Available at SSRN: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4314977 (access date: 24.09,2024).
41. Gora A., de Wilde P. (2022). The essence of democratic backsliding in the European Union: deliberation and rule of law // Journal of European Public Policy. Vol. 29. Is. 3. Pp. 342-362. DOI: 10.1080/13501763.2020.1855465.
42. Graham J., Haidt J., Nosek B.A. (2009). Liberals and Conservatives Rely on Different Sets of Moral Foundations // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Vol. 96. No. 5. Pp. 1029 -1046.
43. Green L. (2004). The Normativity of Law: What is the Problem? // Oxford Handbook of Jurisprudence and Legal Philosophy / S. Shapiro, J. Coleman (Eds.). - Oxford: Oxford University Press.
44. Greenwald B.C., Stiglitz J.E. (1986). Externalities in economies with imperfect information and incomplete markets // Quarterly Journal of Economics. Vol. 101. No. 2. Pp. 229-264.
45. Gries T., Mdller V., Jost J.T. (2022). The Market for Belief Systems: A Formal Model of Ideological Choice // Psychological Inquiry. Vol. 33. Is. 2. Pp. 65-83.
46. Grillo E., Luo Z., Nalepa M., Prato C. (2024). Theories of Democratic Backsliding // Annual Review of Political Science. Vol. 27. Pp. 381-400.
47. Grunhage T., Reuter M. (2021). Tell Me Who You Vote for, and I'll Tell You Who You Are? The Associations of Political Orientation with Personality and Prosocial Behavior and the Plausibility of Evolutionary Approaches // Frontiers in Psychology. Vol. 12. Article 656725.
48. Haaga PT. (2020). Law as a normative system in the philosophy of Joseph Raz // Amamihe: Journal of Applied Philosophy. Vol. 18. No. 6. Pp. 157-173. DOI: 10.13140/RG2.2.19602.39043.
49. Haferkamp A., Fetchenhauer D., Belschak F, Enste D. (2009). Efficiency versus fairness: The evaluation of labor market policies by economists and laypeople // Journal of Economic Psychology. Vol. 30. Is. 4. Pp. 527-539.
50. Hatemi P.K., Medland S.E., Klemmensen R., Oskarsson S., Littvay L., Dawes C.T., VerhulstB., McDermott R., Norgaard A.S., Klofstad C.A., Christensen K., Johannesson M., Magnusson P.K., Eaves L.J., Martin N.G. (2014). Genetic Influences on Political Ideologies: Twin Analyses of 19 Measures of Political Ideologies from Five Democracies and Genome-Wide Findings from Three Populations // Behavior Genetics. Vol. 44. Is. 3. Pp. 282-294.
51. Helzer E.G., Pizarro D.A. (2011). Dirty liberals! Reminders of physical cleanliness influence moral and political attitudes // Psychological Science. Vol. 22. Is. 4. Pp. 517-522.
52. Hodgson G.M. (2006). What Are Institutions? // Journal of Economic Issues. Vol. 40. No. 1. Pp. 1-25.
53. Inbar Y., Pizarro D.A., Bloom P. (2009). Conservatives are more easily disgusted than liberals // Cognition and Emotion. Vol. 23. Is. 4. Pp. 714-725.
54. Jaramillo B., Lombo J.A. (2024). Reflective Minds: A Bibliographic Review of Ancestral Practices in the Worldview of Amerindian Peoples toward the Healing of the Spirit // Anfora. Vol. 31. Is. 56. Pp. 319-347.
55. Johnson S.G.B., Zhang J., Keil F.C. (2022). Win-win denial: The psychological underpinnings of zero-sum thinking // Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. Vol. 151. Is. 2. Pp. 455-474. DOI: 10.1037/xge0001083.
56. Jost J.T., Nosek B.A., Gosling S.D. (2008). Ideology: Its resurgence in social, personality, and political psychology // Perspectives on Psychological Science. Vol. 3. No. 2. Pp. 126-136.
57. Kandler C., Bleidorn W., Riemann R. (2012). Left or right? Sources of political orientation: the roles of genetic factors, cultural transmission, assortative mating, and personality // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Vol. 102. Is.3. Pp. 633-645.
58. Kelemen R.D. (2017). Europe's Other Democratic Deficit: National Authoritarianism in Europe's Democratic Union // Government and Opposition. Vol. 52. No. 2. Pp. 211-238.
59. Killick A. (2017). Do People Really Lack Knowledge About the Economy: A Reply to Facchini // Political Quarterly. Vol. 88. Is. 2. Pp. 265-272.
60. Kirchmaier I., Prufer J., Trautmann S.T. (2018). Religion, moral attitudes and economic behavior // Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization. Vol. 148. Pp. 282-300.
61. Koltko-Rivera M.E. (2004). The Psychology of Worldviews // Review of General Psychology. Vol. 8. No. 1. Pp. 3-58. Lanza G., Patti D.M.A., Navarra P. (2020). Can Citizens Affect the Performance of Their Elected Representatives? A Principal-Agent Model of Strategic Interaction in Democratic Systems // Mathematics. Vol. 8. No. 7. Article 1194. DOI: 10.3390/math8071194.
62. Leiser D., Aroch R. (2009). Lay understanding of macroeconomic causation: The good-begets-good heuristic // Applied Psychology: An International Review. Vol. 58. Is. 3. Pp. 370-384.
63. Leiser D., Shemesh Y. (2018). How We Misunderstand Economics and Why It Matters: The Psychology of Bias, Distortion and Conspiracy. - London: Routledge.
64. Libet B. (1985). Unconscious cerebral initiative and the role of conscious will in voluntary action // Behavioral and Brain Sciences. Vol. 8. No. 4. Pp. 529-539.
65. McCaffery E.J., Baron J. (2005). The Political Psychology of Redistribution // UCLA Law Review. Vol. 52. Is. 6. Pp. 1745-1792.
66. Perkins K.M., Toskos Dils A., Flusberg S.J. (2020). The perceived threat of demographic shifts depends on how you think the economy works // Group Processes & Intergroup Relations. Vol. 25. Is. 1. Pp. 227-246. DOI: 10.1177/1368430220951621
67. Perry R., Sibley C.G., Duckitt J. (2013). Dangerous and competitive worldviews: A meta-analysis of their associations with social dominance orientation and right-wing authoritarianism // Journal of Research in Personality. Vol. 47. Is. 1. Pp. 116-127.
68. Pies I. (2023). Folk economics and folk ethics as problems of moral reasoning: Ordonomic inspirations for business ethics. Martin-Luther-Universitat Halle-Wittenberg, Diskussionspapier No. 13.
69. Piotrowski J., Rozycka-Tran J., Baran T., Zemojtel-Piotrowska M. (2019). Zero-sum thinking as mediator of the relationship of national attitudes with (un)willingness to host refugees in own country // International Journal of Psychology. Vol. 54. Is. 6. Pp. 722-730.
70. Pollack B., Pollack M. (1993). Overview: the vulnerability of democracy // Parliamentary Affairs. Vol. 46. Is. 4. Pp. 447-457.
71. Prior M. (2010). You've either got it or you don't? The stability of political interest over the life cycle // Journal of Politics. Vol. 72. Is. 3. Pp. 747-766.
72. Reinecke J., Ansari S. (2015). What Is a "Fair" Price? Ethics as Sensemaking // Organization Science. Vol. 26. No. 3. Pp. 867-888.
73. Rozycka-Tran J., Jurek P., Olech M., Piotrowski J., Zemojtel-Piotrowska M. (2019). A Warrior Society: Data From 30 Countries Show That Belief in a Zero-Sum Game Is Related to Military Expenditure and Low Civil Liberties // Frontiers in Psychology. Vol. 9. Article 2645.
74. Rubin P.H. (2003). Folk Economics // Southern Economic Journal. Vol. 70. No. 1. Pp. 157-171.
75. Rubin P.H. (2014a). Buchanan, Economics, and Politics // Southern Economic Journal. Vol. 80. No. 4. Pp. 912-917.Rubin P.H. (2014b). Emporiophobia (fear of markets): Cooperation or competition? // Southern Economic Journal. Vol. 80. Is. 4. Pp. 875-889.
76. Shin D.C. (2021). Democratic Deconsolidation in East Asia: Exploring System Realignments in Japan, Korea, and Taiwan // Democratization. Vol. 28. Is. 1. Pp. 142-160.
77. Smith K.B., Oxley D.R., Hibbing M.V., Alford J.R., Hibbing J.R. (2011). Linking genetics and political attitudes: Reconceptualizing political ideology // Political Psychology. Vol. 32. No. 3. Pp. 369-397.
78. Smith K.B., Warren C. (2020). Physiology predicts ideology. Or does it? The current state of political psychophysiology research // Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences. Vol. 34. Pр. 88-93. DOI: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2020.01.001.
79. Swedberg R. (2018). Folk economics and its role in Trump's presidential campaign: An exploratory study // Theory and Society. Vol. 47. No. 1. Pp. 1-36.
80. Sznycer D., Seal M.F.L., Sell A., Lim J., Porat R., Shalvi S., Halperin E., Cosmides L., Tooby J. (2017). Support for redistribution is shaped by compassion, envy, and self-interest, but not a taste for fairness // Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA. Vol. 114. No. 31. Pp. 8420-8425.
81. Terrizzi J.A., Shook N.J., McDaniel M.A. (2013). The behavioral immune system and social conservatism: A metaanalysis // Evolution and Human Behavior.Vol. 34. Is. 2. Pp. 99-108.
82. Weaver R.K. (1986). The Politics of Blame Avoidance // Journal of Public Policy. Vol. 6. No. 4. Pp. 371-398.
83. Williamson M., Wearing A. (1996). Lay people's cognitive models of the economy // Journal of Economic Psychology. Vol. 17. Is. 1. Pp. 3-38.
84. Zeigler-Hill V., Martinez J.L., Vrabel J.K., Ezenwa M.O., Oraetue H., Nweze T., Andrews D., Kenny B. (2020). The darker angels of our nature: Do social worldviews mediate the associations that dark personality features have with ideological attitudes? // Personality and Individual Differences. Vol. 160. Article 109920. URL: https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1016/j.paid.2020.109920 (access date: 24.09.2024).
85. * Йельский университет (Yale University) (США) признан нежелательной организацией в России.