ISSN 2587-7666 (Online)
Поиск
/
ВТЭ

Вопросы теоретической экономики

Институт экономики Российской академии наук

Методология экономической наукиНаучная статья

КОНЦЕПТ УКОРЕНЁННОСТИ В ТЕОРИИ И ЭМПИРИЧЕСКИХ ИССЛЕДОВАНИЯХ

EMBEDDEDNESS CONCEPT IN THE THEORY AND EMPIRICAL RESEARCH

Страницы: 25-45
УДК: 000
JEL: B52, D91, Z13

Авторы

Тамбовцев Виталий Леонидович

доктор экономических наук, профессор

ORCID: 0000

tambovtsev@econ.msu.ru

  • главный научный сотрудник, Московский государственный университет им. М.В.Ломоносова
Получена: 15.09.2022
Принята в печать: 11.10.2022

Аннотация

Стандартным объектом критики мейнстрима экономической теории со стороны социальных исследователей и гетеродоксальных экономистов выступает имеющий якобы место неучёт (недостаточный или неправильный учёт) в нем социальных факторов экономических решений и действий. В качестве одного из оснований такой критики часто используется концепт укоренённости экономического поведения в социальных структурах. Целью статьи является его анализ, базирующийся на сопоставлении содержания этого концепта с эмпирическими результатами, полученными в рамках психологии, социальной психологии и нейронауке в сфере изучения в них процессов принятия решений. Проведённое исследование показало, что при формировании изучаемого понятия не были учтены результаты, полученные в психологии и социальной психологии до середины 1980-х гг., а при его использовании для критики мейнстрима — результаты исследований в нейронауке за последние два десятилетия. Кроме того, исследование позволяет сделать вывод о том, что «правильная» методика учёта социального в экономике, содержащаяся в статье М. Грановеттера 1985 г., если бы она была практически осуществима, способна была бы приводить лишь к детальным биографическим описания конкретных людей, а не к тем или иным научным обобщениям и выявлению регулярностей и закономерностей.

Ключевые слова

экономические решениясоциальные факторыукоренённость

Литература

  1. Койфман А. Я. (2016). Установка и неосознаваемый семантический прайминг: разные термины или разные феномены? // Российский журнал когнитивной науки. T. 3. №4. C. 45 – 62.
  2. Тамбовцев В. Л. (2020). Непродуктивность попыток методологического синтеза // Вопросы теоретической экономики. № 3. С. 7–31.
  3. Ajzen I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior // Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. Vol. 50. No.2. Pр. 179-211.
  4. Ajzen I. (2002). Perceived behavioral control, self-efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behavior // Journal of Applied Social Psychology. Vol 32. Is 4. Pp. 665–683.
  5. Ajzen I., Driver B. L. (1991). Prediction of leisure participation from behavioral, normative, and control beliefs: An application of the theory of planned behavior// Leisure Sciences. Vol. 13. No.3. Pp. 185-204.
  6. Ajzen I., Fishbein M. (2000). Attitudes and the attitude-behavior relation: Reasoned and automatic processes // European Review of Social Psychology. Vol 11. Is. 1. Pр. 1-33.
  7. Akçay E., Van Cleve J., Feldman M. W. & Roughgarden J. (2009). A theory for the evolution of other-regard integrating proximate and ultimate perspectives // Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences . Vol.106 (45). Pp. 19061‑19066.
  8. Allport G. W. (1935). Attitudes // Handbook of Social Psychology / C. Murchison (ed.) — Worcester, MA: Clark University Press. Pp. 798-844.
  9. Angner E. (2019). We’re all behavioral economists now // Journal of Economic Methodology. Vol.26. No.3. Pp. 195–207.
  10. Aslin R. N., Newport E. L. (2012). Statistical learning: From acquiring specific items to forming general rules // Current Directions in Psychological Science. Vol. 21. No.3. Pp. 170–176.
  11. Aslin R. N., Saffran J. R., Newport E. L. (1998). Computation of conditional probability statistics by 8-month-old infants // Psychological Science. Vol. 9. No.4. Pp. 321–324.
  12. Bargh J. A., Chartrand T. L. (1999). The unbearable automaticity of being // American Psychologist. Vol. 54. No.7. Pp. 462–479.
  13. Bargh J. A., Schwader K. L., Hailey S. E., Dyer R. L. and Boothby E. J. (2012). Automaticity in social-cognitive processes // Trends in Cognitive Sciences. Vol. 16. No. 12. Pр. 593-605.
  14. Bargh J. A., Williams E. L. (2006). The Automaticity of Social Life // Current Directions in Psychological Science. Vol. 15. No. 1. Pp. 1-4.
  15. Bar-Kalifa E. & Sened H. (2020). Using Network Analysis for Examining Interpersonal Emotion Dynamics // Multivariate Behavioral Research. Vol. 55. Is 2. Pp. 211-230.
  16. Becker G. (1974). A theory of social interactions // Journal of Political Economy. Vol. 82. No. 6. Pр. 1063-1093.
  17. Becker G. (1976). The Economic Approach to Human Behavior. – Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  18. Bhanji J. P., Delgado M. R. (2014). The social brain and reward: Social information processing in the human striatum // Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science. Vol. 5. No. 1. Pр. 61-71.
  19. Bogaert S., Boone C., Declerck C. (2008). Social value orientation and cooperation in social dilemmas: a review and conceptual model // British Journal of Social Psychology. Vol. 47. Is. 3. Pp. 453–480.
  20. Boorman S. A., White H. C. (1976). Social Structure from Multiple Networks. II. Role Structures // American Journal of Sociology. Vol. 81. No. 6. Pp. 1384-1446.
  21. Briscoe F., Tsai W. (2011). Overcoming Relational Inertia: How Organizational Members Respond to Acquisition Events in a Law Firm // Administrative Science Quarterly. Vol. 56. No. 3. Pр. 408-440.
  22. Camerer C., Thaler R. (1995). Anomalies: Ultimatums, Dictators and Manners // Journal of Economic Perspectives. Vol. 9. No.2. Pp. 209–219.
  23. Chaiklin H. (2011). Attitudes, Behavior, and Social Practice // Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare. Vol. 38. Nо. 1. Pр. 31-54.
  24. Chen M., Bargh J. A. (1999). Consequences of automatic evaluation: Immediate behavioral predispositions to approach and avoid the stimulus // Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. Vol. 25. No. 2. 215–224.
  25. Clavien C., Chapuisat M. (2016). The evolution of utility functions and psychological altruism // Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences. Vol. 56. Pр. 24-31.
  26. Dasgupta N., Greenwald A. G. (2001). On the malleability of automatic attitudes: Combating automatic prejudice with images of admired and disliked individuals // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Vol. 81. No.5. Pp. 800–814.
  27. De Houwer J. (2019). Moving beyond the distinction between System 1 and System 2: Conditioning, implicit evaluation, and habitual responding might also be mediated by relational knowledge // Experimental Psychology. Vol. 66. No.4. Pp. 257–265.
  28. De Houwer J., Van Dessel P., Moran T. (2021). Attitudes as propositional representations // Trends in Cognitive Sciences. Vol. 25. Is. 10. Pр. 870-882.
  29. De Neys W. (2006). Dual processing in reasoning: Two systems but one reasoned // Psychological Science. Vol. 17. No.5. Pp. 428-433.
  30. Dequech D. (2003). Cognitive and Cultural Embeddedness: Combining Institutional Economics and Economic Sociology // Journal of Economic Issues. Vol. 37. No. 2. Pр. 461-470.
  31. Devine P. G. (1989). Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Vol. 56. No.1. Pp. 5–18.
  32. Dewey C. (2021). Reframing Single- and Dual-Process Theories as Cognitive Models: Commentary on De Neys (2021) // Perspectives on Psychological Science. Vol.16. No.6. Pp. 1428-1431.
  33. Drakopoulos S. A. (2022). The Conceptual Resilience of the Atomistic Individual in Mainstream Economic Rationality // MPRA Paper No. 112944.
  34. Dual Process Theories in Social Psychology (1999) / S. Chaiken, Y. Trope (eds.) — New York: Guilford.
  35. Duckworth K. L., Bargh J. A., Garcia M., Chaiken S. (2002). The Automatic Evaluation of Novel Stimuli // Psychological Science. Vol. 13. No.6. Pp.513-519.
  36. Duesenberry J. (1960). Comment on «An Economic Analysis of Fertility» // Demographic and Economic Change in Developed Countries / G.B. Roberts (ed.) — Cambridge, MA: Columbia University Press. Pр. 231-234.
  37. Elder-Vass D. (2020). Defining the gift // Journal of Institutional Economics. Vol. 16. Is 5. Pp. 675 – 685.
  38. Evans J.S.B.T. (2003). In two minds: Dual-process accounts of reasoning // Trends in Cognitive Sciences. Vol.7. No.10. Pр. 454-459.
  39. Evans J.S.B.T. (2010). Thinking Twice: Two Minds in One Brain. – Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
  40. Evans J.S.B.T. (2016). Reasoning, biases and dual processes: The lasting impact of Wason (1960) // Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. Vol. 69. No.10. Pр. 2076-2092.
  41. Evans J.S.B.T., Stanovich K. E. (2013). Dual-Process Theories of Higher Cognition: Advancing the Debate // Perspectives on Psychological Science. Vol. 8. No.3. Pp.223-241.
  42. Fazio R. H. (2007). Attitudes as object-evaluation associations of varying strength // Social Cognition. Vol. 25. No.5. Pp. 603–637.
  43. Fazio R.H., Sanbonmatsu D.M., Powell M.C., Kardes F.R. (1986). On the automatic activation of attitudes // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Vol. 50. No. 2. Pp. 229-238.
  44. Fazio R. H., Zanna M. P. (1981). Direct experience and attitude-behavior consistency // Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. Vol 14. Pp.161-202.
  45. Fehr E., Schmidt K. M. (2006). The Economics of Fairness, Reciprocity and Altruism – Experimental Evidence and New Theories // Handbook of the Economics of Giving, Altruism and Reciprocity. Vol. 1 / S.-C. Kolm, J. Mercier Ythier (eds.) — Amsterdam, New York: Elsevier. Pp. 615–691.
  46. Ferguson M. J., Zayas V. (2009). Automatic Evaluation // Current Directions in Psychological Science. Vol. 18. No. 6. Pp. 362-366.
  47. Fishbein M., Ajzen I. (1974). Attitudes toward objects as predictors of single and multiple behavioral criteria // Psychological Review. Vol. 81. No.1. Pp. 59-74.
  48. Fishbein M., Ajzen I. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An introduction to theory and research. – Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  49. Fleetwood S. (2021). A definition of habit for socio-economics // Review of Social Economy. Vol. 79. Is 2. Pp. 131-165
  50. Frankish K., Evans J. S. B. T. (2009). The duality of mind: An historical perspective // Two Minds: Dual Processes and Beyond / J.S.B.T. Evans, K. Frankish (eds.) – Oxford: Oxford University Press. Pp. 1–31.
  51. Gawronski B., Sherman J. W., Trope Y. (2014). Two of what? A conceptual analysis of dual-process theories // Dual-process Theories of the Social Mind. / J.W. Sherman, B. Gawronski, Y. Trope (eds.) — New York: Guilford Press. Pp. 3–19.
  52. Gemici K. (2008). Karl Polanyi and the antinomies of embeddedness // Socio-Economic Review. Vol.6. No.1. Pp. 5–33.
  53. Granovetter M. (1985). Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness // American Journal of Sociology. Vol. 91. No. 3. Pр. 481-510.
  54. Gu R., Huang W., Camilleri J., Xu P., Wei P., Eickhoff S. B., Feng C. (2019). Love is analogous to money in human brain: Coordinate-based and functional connectivity meta-analyses of social and monetary reward anticipation // Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews. Vol. 100. Pр. 108-128.
  55. Halford G. S., Wilson W. H., Phillips S. (2010). Relational Knowledge: The Foundation of Higher Cognition // Trends in Cognitive Sciences. Vol. 14. No.11. Pp.497-505.
  56. Halford G.S., Wilson W. H., Phillips S. (1998). Processing capacity defined by relational complexity: Implications for comparative, developmental, and cognitive psychology // Behavioral and Brain Sciences. Vol. 21. Is. 6. Pp. 803 – 831.
  57. Hicks L. L., McNulty J. K. (2019).The Unbearable Automaticity of Being . . . in a Close Relationship // Current Directions in Psychological Science. Vol. 28. No.3. Pp.254-259.
  58. Hodgkinson G. P., Sadler-Smith E., Burke L. A., Claxton G. and Sparrow P. R. (2009). Intuition in Organizations: Implications for Strategic Management // Long Range Planning. Vol 42. Is 3. Pp. 277-297.
  59. Hodgson G. M. (2004). Reclaiming habit for institutional economics // Journal of Economic Psychology. Vol. 25. Is. 5. Pр. 651–660.
  60. Hodgson G. M. (2019). Taxonomic definitions in social science, with firms, markets and institutions as case studies // Journal of Institutional Economics. Vol. 15. No. 2. Pp. 207–233.
  61. Horodecka A. (2017). The methodology of evolutionary and neoclassical economics as a consequence of the changes in the concept of human nature // Argumenta Oeconomica. Vol. 39. No.2. Pp.129-166.
  62. Izuma K., Saito D. N., Sadato N. (2008). Processing of social and monetary rewards in the human striatum // Neuron. Vol. 58. No.2. Pp.284-294.
  63. Kahneman D. (2003). Maps of Bounded Rationality: Psychology for Behavioral Economics // American Economic Review. Vol. 93. No. 5. Pp. 1449-1475.
  64. Kahneman D. (2011). Thinking, Fast and Slow. – New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux.
  65. Kahneman D., Frederick S. (2005). A model of heuristic judgment // The Cambridge Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning. / K.J. Holyoak, R.G. Morrison (eds.) — Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Pp. 267–293.
  66. Kahneman D., Knetsch J. L., Thaler R. H. (1986). Fairness and the Assumptions of Economics // Journal of Business. Vol. 59. No. 4. Part 2: The Behavioral Foundations of Economic Theory. Pp. S285-S300.
  67. Kareev Y. (2000). Seven (indeed, plus or minus two) and the detection of correlations // Psychological Review. Vol. 107. No.2. Pp. 397–402
  68. Keren G. (2013). A tale of two systems: A scientific advance or a theoretical stone soup? Commentary on Evans & Stanovich // Perspectives on Psychological Science. Vol. 8. No. 3. Pp. 257-262.
  69. Keren G., Schul Y. (2009). Two is not always better than one: A critical evaluation of two-system theories // Perspectives on Psychological Science. Vol. 4. No.6. Pр. 533-550.
  70. Kruglanski A. W., Gigerenzer G. (2011). Intuitive and deliberate judgments are based on common principles // Psychological Review. Vol. 118. No.1. Pp. 97–109
  71. Kruglanski A. W., Jaśko K., Chernikova M., Milyavsky M., Babush M., Baldner C., Pierro A. (2015). The rocky road from attitudes to behaviors: Charting the goal systemic course of actions // Psychological Review. Vol. 122. Is. 4. Pp, 598-620
  72. Langer E. J. (1978). Rethinking the Role of Thought in Social Interaction // New Directions in Attribution Research, Vol. 2. / J. H. Harvey, W. Ickes, R. F. Kidd (eds.) — New York: Psychology Press. Pp. 35-58.
  73. Langer E. J., Blank A., Chanowitz B. (1978). The mindlessness of ostensibly thoughtful action: The role of «placebic» information in interpersonal interaction // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Vol. 36. No.6. Pp. 635–642.
  74. LaPiere R. T. (1934). Attitudes vs. actions // Social Forces. Vol. 13. No. 2. Pp. 230-237
  75. Leibenstein H. (1976). Beyond Economic Man. – Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
  76. Levy D. J., Glimcher P. W. (2012). The root of all value: a neural common currency for choice // Current Opinion in Neurobiology. Vol. 22. Is. 6. Pр. 1027–1038.
  77. Loewenstein G. F., Thompson L., Bazerman M. H. (1989). Social utility and decision making in interpersonal contexts // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Vol. 57. No.3. Pp. 426–441.
  78. Madden T. J., Ellen P. S., Ajzen I. (1992). A comparison of the theory of planned behavior and the theory of reasoned action // Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. Vol. 18. No.1. Pp. 3–9.
  79. Mantzavinos C. (2006). The Role of Definitions in Institutional Analysis // Wettbewerb im Gesundheitswesen. Konzeptionen und Felder ordnungsökonomischen Denkens / F. Daumann, C. Mantzavinos, S. Okruch (eds.) — Budapest: Schriftenreihe Adrássy Universität. Pp. 85-92.
  80. Moors A. (2016). Automaticity: Componential, causal, and mechanistic explanations // Annual Review of Psychology. Vol. 67. No. 1. Pр. 263-287.
  81. Moors A., De Houwer J. (2006). Automaticity: A Theoretical and Conceptual Analysis // Psychological Bulletin. Vol. 132. No. 2. Pp. 297–326.
  82. Neal D. T., Wood W., Labrecque J. S., Lally P. (2012). How do habits guide behavior? Perceived and actual triggers of habits in daily life // Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. Vol 48. Is 2. Pр. 492-498.
  83. Newell B. R., Shanks D. R. (2014). Unconscious influences on decision making: A critical review // Behavioral and Brain Sciences.Vol. 37. No.1. Pp.1-19.
  84. Niemiec R. M., Champine V., Vaske J. J., Mertens A. (2020). Does the Impact of Norms Vary by Type of Norm and Type of Conservation Behavior? A Meta-Analysis // Society & Natural Resources: An International Journal. Vol. 33. Is. 8. Pp. 1024-1040.
  85. North D.C. (1984). Transaction costs, institutions, and economic history // Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics. Vol. 140. No. 1. Pp. 7–17.
  86. Petty R. E., Briñol P. (2010). Attitude change // Advanced Social Psychology: The State of the Science. / R.F. Baumeister, E.J.Finkel (eds.) — Oxford: Oxford University Press. Pp. 217–259.
  87. Polanyi K. (1944). Origins of Out Time: The Great Transformation. 1st Edition. – New York: Farrar & Rinehart.
  88. Rabin M. (1993). Incorporating fairness into game theory and economics // American Economic Review. Vol. 83. No. 5. Pp. 1281-302.
  89. Randall D.M., Wolff J.A. (1994). The time interval in the intention-behavior relationship: Meta-analysis // British Journal of Social Psychology. Vol. 33. No.4. Pp. 405-418.
  90. Rivera M. T., Soderstrom S. B., Uzzi B. (2010). Dynamics of Dyads in Social Networks: Assortative, Relational, and Proximity Mechanisms // Annual Review of Sociology. Vol. 36. Pp.91–115.
  91. Rojas-Barahona C. A., Moreno-Ríos S., García-Madruga J. A., Förster C. E. (2021). Content of relationship, number of alternatives and working memory capacity in conditional inferences // Current Psychology, in press. DOI: 10.1007/s12144-021-01966-3
  92. Ross D. (2022). Economics is converging with sociology but not with psychology // Journal of Economic Methodology, in press. DOI: 10.1080/1350178X.2022.2049854
  93. Rudman L. A. (2004). Sources of Implicit Attitudes // Current Directions in Psychological Science. Vol. 13. No.2. Pp.79-82.
  94. Rydell R. J., Gawronski B. (2009). I like you, I like you not: Understanding the formation of context-dependent automatic attitudes // Cognition and Emotion. Vol. 23. Is. 6. Pр. 1118-1152.
  95. Saffran J. R., Aslin R. N., Newport E. L. (1996). Statistical learning by 8-month-old infants // Science. Vol. 274 (5294). Pр. 1926-1928.
  96. Saxe R., Haushofer J. (2008). For Love or Money: A Common Neural Currency for Social and Monetary Reward // Neuron. Vol. 58. No.2. Pp.164-165.
  97. Sheeran P., Webb T. L. (2016). The intention – behavior gap // Social and Personality Psychology Compass. Vol. 10. No.9. Pp. 503–518.
  98. Sheeran P. (2002). Intention-behavior relations: A conceptual and empirical review // European Review of Social Psychology. Vol. 12. Pp. 1-36.
  99. Shepherd B.H., Hartwick J., Warshaw P.R. (1988). The theory of reasoned action: A meta-analysis of past research with recommendations for modifications and future research // Journal of Consumer Research. Vol. 15. No 3. Pp. 325-342.
  100. Sherman B. E., Graves K. N., Turk-Browne N. B. (2020). The prevalence and importance of statistical learning in human cognition and behavior // Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences. Vol.32. Pp.15–20.
  101. Shiffrin R. M., Dumais S. T. (1981). The development of automatism. // Cognitive skills and their acquisition. /J.R. Anderson (ed.) — Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Pp. 111 -140.
  102. Sivacek J., Crano W. D. (1982). Vested interest as a moderator of attitude-behavior consistency // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Vol. 43. No.2. Pр. 210-221.
  103. Stanovich K. E. (2009). Distinguishing the reflective, algorithmic and autonomous minds: Is it time for a tri-process theory? // In Two Minds: Dual Processes and Beyond / J.St.B.T. Evans, K. Frankish (Eds.). – Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. Pp. 55–88.
  104. Stanovich K. E., West R. F. (2000). Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate? // Behavioral and Brain Sciences. Vol 23. Is 5. Pp. 645–726.
  105. Tompson S. H., Kahn A. E., Falk E. B., Vettel J. M., Bassett D. S. (2019). Individual differences in learning social and nonsocial network structures // Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. Vol. 45. No.2. Pp. 253–271.
  106. Tsoklinova M. (2020). The Neoclassical Economics through the Prism of the Heterodoxy Economic Concept // Çukurova Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi. Vol. 24. No.1. Pр.1-13.
  107. Urbina D. A., Ruiz-Villaverde A. (2019). A Critical Review of Homo Economicus from Five Approaches // American Journal of Economics and Sociology. Vol. 78. No. 1. Pр. 63-93.
  108. Wake S. J., Izuma K. (2017). A common neural code for social and monetary rewards in the human striatum // Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience. Vol. 12. No.10. Pp. 1558-1564.
  109. Wason P. C., Evans J. S. B. T. (1975). Dual processes in reasoning? //Cognition. Vol 3. Is 2. Pр. 141–154.
  110. Wason P. C. (1960). On the failure to eliminate hypotheses in a conceptual task // Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. Vol. 12. No.3. Pр. 129–140.
  111. Weigel R. H., Newman L. S. (1976). Increasing attitude-behavior correspondence by broading the scope of the behavioral measure // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Vol. 33. No.6. Pp. 793-802.
  112. Wentura D. (2019). Cognition and emotion: On paradigms and metaphors // Cognition and Emotion. Vol. 33. No.31. Pp.1-9.
  113. Wicker A. W. (1969). Attitudes versus actions: The relationship of verbal and overt behavioral responses to attitude objects // Journal of Social Issues. Vol. 25. No.4. Pр. 41-78.
  114. Wilson T. D., Lindsey S., Schooler T. Y. (2000). A model of dual attitudes // Psychological Review. Vol. 107. No.1. Pр. 101-126.
  115. Zhao J., Al-Aidroos N.,Turk-Browne N. B. (2013). Attention Is Spontaneously Biased Toward Regularities // Psychological Science. Vol. 24. No. 5. Pр. 667-677.

© Тамбовцев Виталий Леонидович, 2022

© ФГБУН Институт экономики Российской академии наук «Вопросы теоретической экономики», 2022

Для цитирования

Тамбовцев Виталий Леонидович. КОНЦЕПТ УКОРЕНЁННОСТИ В ТЕОРИИ И ЭМПИРИЧЕСКИХ ИССЛЕДОВАНИЯХ // Вопросы теоретической экономики. 2022. № 4 (17). С. 25-45. DOI: 10.52342/2587-7666VTE_2022_4_25_45.