ИНСТИТУЦИОНАЛЬНАЯ СЛОЖНОСТЬ: НОВОЕ НАПРАВЛЕНИЕ ИЗУЧЕНИЯ ИНСТИТУТОВ?
INSTITUTIONAL COMPLEXITY: IS IT A NEW DIRECTION FOR INSTITUTIONAL RESEARCH?
Авторы
Тамбовцев Виталий Леонидович
д.э.н., профессор
ORCID: 0000
tambovtsev@econ.msu.ru
- главный научный сотрудник, Московский государственный университет им.М.В.Ломоносова
Аннотация
В последнее время концепция сложности и сложных систем получила достаточно широкое распространение в различных областях социальных наук, в том числе и в экономической науке. Этот поворот к сложности затронул и изучение институтов. Статья посвящена анализу сложившихся направлений применения концепции сложности в институциональных исследованиях с точки зрения полученных в них результатов. Особое внимание уделено понятию «институциональная сложность», получившему широкое распространение в рамках организационного институционализма. Показано, что это понятие не отражает какое-либо новое, ранее не исследуемое явление, а обозначает частный случай ситуации выбора из нескольких альтернатив, некоторые из которых оказываются результатом следования разным институтам. Анализируются причины широкого распространения этого понятия, обусловленные современными особенностями конкуренции в науке.
Ключевые слова
Литература
- Джалилова Е.А. (2018). Проблемы определения понятия и сущности института права [Dzhalilova E.A. (2018). Problems of definition of the concept and essence of the institute of law] // Вестник Волжского университета имени В.Н. Татищева. Т. 1. № 2. С. 22-31.
- Ирхин Ю. В. (2014). Управленческий потенциал, возможности и пределы институционализма и неоинституционализма [Irhin, Ju. V. (2014). Management potential, opportunities and limits of institutionalism and neoinstitutionalism] // Ars Administrandi . № 2. C. 63–71.
- Исламутдинов В. Ф. (2014). Сущность и классификация институтов институциональной среды инновационной деятельности [Islamutdinov V. F. (2014). The essence and classification of the institutions of the institutional environment of innovation] // Journal of Institutional Studies. Т. 6. № 2. С. 79-90.
- Орехова С. В. (2015). Методологические основы определения институциональной сложности рынка [Orekhova S. V. (2015). Methodological Bases for Determining Institutional Complexity of Markets] // Управленец. № 4. С. 24-35.
- Орехова С.В. (2016). Теоретическая модель анализа институциональной среды отраслевых рынков [Orekhova S.V. (2016). The theoretical model of the institutional environment industry markets analysis] // Теоретическая и прикладная экономика. № 3. С. 164-176.
- Тамбовцев В. Л. (2022a). Конкуренция: условие или барьер роста научного знания? [Tambovtsev V. L. (2022a). Competition: Provision or Barrier for the Growth of Scientific Knowledge?] // Управление наукой: теория и практика. Т. 4. № 2. С. 143–168.
- Тамбовцев В.Л. (2022b). Множественность институционализмов и трудности научной коммуникации [Tambovtsev V.I. (2022b). The plurality of institution approaches and difficulties of scholarly communication] // Journal of Institutional Studies. №14(1). С. 6–24.
- Тамбовцев В. Л. (2021). Институционализмы в экономической науке: что стоит за их разнообразием? [Tambovtsev, V.L. (2021). Institutionalisms in economics: What are behinds their variety?] // Journal of Institutional Studies. № 13(1). С. 86-99.
- Шварцбурд Ц.В. (2011). Малый бизнес в российской олигополистической экономике [Shwartsburd Ts. V. (2011). Small business in Russian oligopolistic economy] // Journal of Institutional Studies. Т. 3. № 2. С. 59-97.
- Шмерлина И. А. (2016). «Институциональная логика»: критический анализ направления [Shmerlina I. A. (2016). “Institutional Logics”: Critical Analysis of the Direction] // Социологический журнал. Т. 22. № 4. С. 110-138.
- Armstrong J. S. (1982). Barriers to Scientific Contributions: The Author's Formula // Behavioral and Brain Sciences. Vol. 5. No. 2. Рp. 197-199.
- Arthur W. (1999). Complexity and the Economy // Science. Vol. 284. No. 5411. Pр. 107-109.
- Banks G., Pollack J. M., Bochantin J., Kirkman B. L., Whelpley C. E. (2016). Management’s Science–Practice Gap: A Grand Challenge for All Stakeholders // Academy of Management Journal. Vol. 59. No. 6. Рр. 2205–2231.
- Beer M. (2001). Why management research findings are unimplementable: an action science perspective // Reflections. Vol. 2. Is. 3. Pp. 58-65.
- Byrne D., Callaghan G. (2014). Complexity Theory and the Social Sciences. – London & New York: Routledge.
- Cameron K. (1986). Effectiveness as paradox: consensus and conflict in perceptions of organizational effectiveness // Management Science. Vol. 32. Is. 5. Pp. 539–53.
- Cilliers P. (2000). What can we learn from a theory of complexity? // Emergence: Complexity and Organization. Vol. 2. No. 1. Pp. 23–33.
- Complex New World. Translating New Economic Thinking into Public Policy (2012). / Dolphin T., Nash D. (eds.). – London: Institute for Public Policy Research.
- Connolly T., Conlon E.J., Deutsch S.J. (1980). Organizational effectiveness: A multiple constituency approach // Academy of Management Review. Vol. 5. No. 2. Pp. 211–17.
- Coon C.S. (1948). A Reader in General Anthropology. – New York: Henry Holt.
- Costa M. C., Teixeira M. G. (2013). Institutional logics and social mechanisms: a pragmatic multilevel perspective // Revista de Administração da Universidade Federal de Santa Maria. Vol. 6. No. 2. Pp. 415-429.
- DeCaro D.A., Chaffin B.C., Schlager E., Garmestani A.S., Ruhl J. B. (2017). Legal and institutional foundations of adaptive environmental governance // Ecology and Society. Vol. 22. Is. 1. Pp. 1- 32.
- Duit A., Galaz V. (2008). Governance and Complexity: Emerging Issues for Governance Theory // Governance. Vol. 21. Is. 3. Pp. 311–335.
- Empson L. (2020). The Emperor’s New Clothes: How Our Fear of Seeming Stupid Became a Self-Fulfilling Prophecy // Academy of Management Learning and Education. Vol. 19. No. 2. Pp. 227–229.
- Faude B. (2020). International Institutions in Hard Times: How Institutional Complexity Increases Resilience // Complexity, Governance & Networks. Vol. 6, No. 1. Pp. 46-54.
- French M., Lowe T., Wilson R., Mary-Lee R., Hawkins M. (2021). Managing the complexity of outcomes: A new approach to performance measurement and management // Handbook on Performance Management in the Public Sector / Blackman D. (ed.). – Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. Pp. 111-128.
- Frickel S., Gross N. (2005). A General Theory of Scientific/Intellectual Movements // American Sociological Review. Vol. 70. No. 2. Pp. 204–232.
- Friedland R., Alford R. R. (1991). Bringing Society Back In: Symbols, Practices, and Institutional Contradictions. // The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis / Powell W.W., DiMaggio P.J. (eds.). – Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Pр. 232-263.
- Gala P., Rocha I., Magacho G. (2018). The structuralist revenge: Economic complexity as an important dimension to evaluate growth and development // Brazilian Journal of Political Economy. Vol. 38. No. 2. Pp. 219—236.
- Goldstein J.A., Hazy J.K., Silberstang J. (2008). Complexity and Social Entrepreneurship: A Fortuitous Meeting // Emergence: Complexity and Organization. Vol. 10. No. 3. Pp. 9-24.
- Goldstein J.A., Hazy J.K., Silberstang J. (2010). A Complexity Science Model of Social Innovation in Social Enterprise // Journal of Social Entrepreneurship. Vol. 1. No. 1. Pр. 101-125.
- Gordon R.A., Howell J.E. (1959). Higher Education for Business. – New York: Columbia University Press.
- Greenwood R., Raynard M., Kodeih F., Micelotta E., Lounsbury M. (2011). Institutional Complexity and Organizational Responses // Academy of Management Annals. Vol. 5. Is.1. Pp. 317-371.
- Haigh N., Walker J., Bacq S., Kickul J. (2015). Hybrid Organizations: Origins, Strategies, Impacts, and Implications // California Management Review. Vol. 57. No. 3. Pр. 5-12.
- Hambrick D. (1994). What if the Academy actually mattered? // Academy of Management Review. Vol. 19. No. 1. Pp. 11-16.
- Hamilton W. H. (1919). The Institutional Approach to Economic Theory //American Economic Review. Vol. 9. No. 1. Pp. 309-318.
- Harris A. L. (1932). Types of Institutionalism // Journal of Political Economy. Vol. 40. No. 6. Pp. 721-749.
- Hausmann R., Hidalgo C.A., Bustos S., Coscia M., Chung S., Jimenez J., Simoes A. J.G., Yildirim M.A. (2014). The Atlas of Economic Complexity. — Cambridge, MA: Puritan Press.
- Hidalgo C.A., Hausmann R. (2009). The Building Blocks of Economic Complexity // Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences US (PNAS). Vol.106 (26). Pp. 10570– 10575.
- Kim R. E. (2020). Is Global Governance Fragmented, Polycentric, or Complex? The State of the Art of the Network Approach // International Studies Review. Vol. 22. Pp. 903–931.
- Kistruck G.M., Beamish P.W. (2010). The Interplay of Form, Structure, and Embeddedness in Social Intrapreneurship // Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. Vol. 34. No. 4. Pp. 735-761.
- Koskela L. (2017). Why is management research irrelevant? // Construction Management and Economics. Vol. 35. Is. 1-2. Pp. 4-23.
- Ladyman J., Lambert J., Wiesner K. (2013). What is a complex system? // European Journal for Philosophy of Science. Vol. 3. No. 1. Pp. 33—67.
- Lakatos I. (1970). Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes // Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge / Lakatos I., Musgrave A. (eds.). – Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Pр. 91-196.
- Lubell M. (2013). Governing Institutional Complexity: The Ecology of Games Framework // Policy Studies Journal. Vol. 41. No. 3. Pp. 537-559.
- May C. K. (2022). Complex adaptive governance systems: a framework to understand institutions, organizations, and people in socio-ecological systems // Socio-Ecological Practice Research. Vol. 4. Is. 1. Pp. 39–54.
- Naroll R. (1956). A preliminary index of social development // American Anthropologist. Vol. 58. No. 4. Pp. 687-715.
- North D. C. (1984). Transaction Costs, Institutions, and Economic History // Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics. Bd. 140. H. 1. Pp. 7-17.
- North D. C. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. – New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Orsini A., Le Prestre P., Haas P. M., Pattberg P., Brosig M., Widerberg O., Gomez-Mera L. (2019). Forum: Complex Systems and International Governance // International Studies Review. Vol. 70. Pp. 1–31.
- Pierson F. C. (1959). The Education of American Businessmen. – New York: John Wiley.
- Płoszajski P. (1978). Organizational Theory and Practice: Cooperation or Ritual Solo Dances? // Polish Sociological Bulletin. No. 43/44. Pp. 127-138.
- Quinn R., Rohrbaugh J. (1981). A competing values approach to organizational effectiveness // Public Productivity Review. Vol. 5. No. 2. Pp. 122–40.
- Roos M. W. (2021). Modeling radical uncertainty and anticipating uncertain change with models // Forum for Social Economics. Vol. 50. Is. 2. Pp. 175–193.
- Sassower R. (2021). Should Anyone Care about Scientific Progress? // Philosophy of the Social Sciences. Vol. 51. Is. 1. Pp. 58–90.
- Sbardella A., Pugliese E., Zaccaria A., Scaramozzino P. (2018). The role of complex analysis in modelling economic growth // Entropy. Vol. 20. No. 11. Article 883.
- Schuck P. H. (1992). Legal complexity: Some causes, consequences, and cures // Duke Law Journal. Vol 42. No. 1. Pр. 1-52.
- Shrivastava P., Mitroff I. I. (1984). Enhancing Organizational Research Utilization: The Role of Decision Makers' Assumptions // Academy of Management Review. Vol. 9. No. 1. Pp. 18-26.
- Sindzingre A. N. (2021). Concept and causation: Issues in the modelling of institutions // Forum for Social Economics. Vol. 50. Is. 2. Pp. 194–213.
- Skelcher C., Smith S. R. (2015). Theorizing Hybridity: Institutional Logics, Complex Organizations, and Actor Identities: The Case of Nonprofits // Public Administration. Vol. 93. No. 2. Pр. 433–448.
- Tacchella A., Cristelli M., Caldarelli G., Gabrielli A., Pietronero L. (2013). Economic Complexity: Conceptual Grounding of a New Metrics for Global Competitiveness // Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control. Vol. 37. Is. 8. Pp. 1683–1691.
- The Complexity Turn: Cultural, Management, and Marketing Applications (2017). / Woodside A.G. (ed.). – Cham: Springer International Publishing.
- Tourish D. (2020). The triumph of nonsense in management studies // Academy of Management Learning & Education. Vol. 19. No. 1. Pp. 99–109.
- Van Assche K., Valentinov V., Verschraegen G. (2022). Adaptive governance: Learning from what organizations do and managing the role they play // Kybernetes. Vol. 51. No. 5. Pp. 1738-1758.
- Van De Ven A.H., Johnson P.E. (2006). Knowledge for Theory and Practice // Academy of Management Review. Vol. 31. No. 4, pp. 802-821.
- Vinci G. V., Benzi R. (2018). Economic complexity: Correlations between gross domestic product and fitness // Entropy. Vol. 20. No. 10. Article 766.
- Von Bertalanffy, L. (1950a). An outline of general system theory // British Journal for the Philosophy of Science. Vol. 1. No. 2. Pp. 134–165.
- Von Bertalanffy, L. (1950b). The Theory of Open Systems in Physics and Biology // Science. Vol. 111. No. 2872. Pp. 23-29.
- Williamson O. E. (1975). Markets and Hierarchies, Analysis and Antitrust Implications: A Study in the Economics of Internal Organization. – New York: Free Press
- Woodhill J. (2010). Capacities for Institutional Innovation: A Complexity Perspective // IDS Bulletin. Vol. 41. Nо. 3. Pр. 47-59.
- Zammuto R. (1984). A comparison of multiple constituency models of organizational effectiveness. – Academy of Management Review. Vol. 9. No. 4. Pp. 606–616.
© Тамбовцев Виталий Леонидович, 2023
© ФГБУН Институт экономики Российской академии наук «Вопросы теоретической экономики», 2023
Для цитирования
Тамбовцев Виталий Леонидович. ИНСТИТУЦИОНАЛЬНАЯ СЛОЖНОСТЬ: НОВОЕ НАПРАВЛЕНИЕ ИЗУЧЕНИЯ ИНСТИТУТОВ? // Вопросы теоретической экономики. 2023. № 2 (19). С. 22-34. DOI: 10.52342/2587-7666VTE_2023_2_22_34.